My Cart

Close

The case against hatchery trout in the Upper East Branch.

Posted on June 05 2021

 The New York State hatchery system has come a long way in improving the trout they stock. Fifty years ago when the limit statewide was ten fish a day and everybody's goal was to keep ten, the state stocked hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of battleship gray yearling trout between 6 and 8 inches long. They were the prey and everything and everybody caught and ate them.

Two major improvements to the hatchery trout stocking program came with the decisions to keep some of the trout in the hatcheries for two years and to add something to their diet to enhance  the color of their skin. The first efforts at holding fish for two years produced fish about 12 inches long. Since that time the size of the released hatchery fish has grown to about 15 inches.

The stocking of the larger, well colored hatchery fish into streams that do not support a wild trout population gives anglers a chance to fish for big heavy trout that are, initially anyway, very easy to catch.  It results in a lot of happy anglers and sells more licenses.

When you stock the same fish in a stream with a viable wild trout population, however, disaster occurs. The Upper East Branch has been stocked for years. The two year old wild trout in the UEB are about 10 inches long and are no match for the15 inch long hatchery trout. The wild yearling trout at 7 inches are a meal for the 15 inch hatchery fish. 

I have fished a riff/run/pool on the UEB for many years.  Yearling wild trout were always abundant, there was also a mix of older wild trout with 18 inch fish always present. One of the places where hatchery fish were dumped into the UEB was this pool.  Two and three years ago an unusually large number of the 15 inch fish were stocked there and they have survived. Fished it last year and caught six large hatchery fish all 16 to 19 inches long. They have become hard to fool and are tough to catch. This year I fished it again with almost the same results (hooked 6 but lost one). Both last year and this year the only fish I saw in the entire area were the hatchery fish.  Never saw a single wild fish. The large hatchery fish have either eaten or driven out the wild trout. The UEB is no longer being stocked but brown trout can live a long time.  If wild trout are to make a rapid comeback in this pool and others where the big hatchery fish have established dominance perhaps the DEC should consider relocating the hatchery fish to streams where there are no wild trout. Or, anglers might consider taking one home for dinner. You'll know when you hook one, they fight like a heavy woolen hunting sock full of water.   

3 comments

  • dave: June 07, 2021

    A good friend was the senior biologist for region 5. He quit after the minimum number of years needed for benefits. He said what drives DEC programs is what fisherman want and that is not always good management and that is why he quit. Just like you have said fisherman are most of the time wanting bigger fish. it is obvious when reading books or looking at blogs it is always photos of the big fish or the best fish of the day was a so and so. I fished the West Branch many years ago and hope to be able to get back there this fall.

  • Jack m: June 06, 2021

    It’s amazing how little thought is given to decisions that affect the wild trout population. I wonder if FUDR could help with this issue? Have you ever tried to talk to anyone at DEC about this and did it get you anywhere?

  • jim vaughan: June 05, 2021

    LOL! “A heavy woolen hunting sock filled with water”——I definitely get the picture (and the message!). I promise that if I feel a heavy woolen sock filled with water on my line in the UEB he’s dinner!!! I only hope I do not get shot by a purist as I make my way up the bank to my car!

Leave a comment

Join our Mailing List

Sign up to receive our Newsletter!

My Cart

Subtotal: $ 0.00

Your cart is currently empty.